In our comparison of Acquia CMS vs. MODX, MODX is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Overall, investing in digital technology can greatly improve business processes and allow for growth and customer relationship-building.
For those considering this software, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits to determine if it is the right choice for your business.
Although it has a high cost of 100k per year, the software has numerous benefits. It is easy to use and provides technical assistance, making it one of the best in its field. Additionally, it offers excellent technical support and is very reliable.
The SEO of the platform is great. Ability of the template located on the site beneath her guidance for a limited number of hours to be changed past recognition by my team members.
Inability of staff without programming skills to completely restructure the tool by themselves. Figures in your account are lacking.
Getting non-technical personnel in our company involved in our current websites management is simpler and the user experience functionality is enhanced.
It is not free.
The SEO module is integrated in CMS MODX, connecting any HTML template is possible, and the admin panel is very convenient.
Inability to quickly master the system and start to fully use the code due to CMS tag syntax. Also, collective development of modules is not possible.
Overall, investing in digital technology can greatly improve business processes and allow for growth and customer relationship-building.
For those considering this software, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits to determine if it is the right choice for your business.
Although it has a high cost of 100k per year, the software has numerous benefits. It is easy to use and provides technical assistance, making it one of the best in its field. Additionally, it offers excellent technical support and is very reliable.
Getting non-technical personnel in our company involved in our current websites management is simpler and the user experience functionality is enhanced.
It is not free.
The SEO of the platform is great. Ability of the template located on the site beneath her guidance for a limited number of hours to be changed past recognition by my team members.
Inability of staff without programming skills to completely restructure the tool by themselves. Figures in your account are lacking.
The SEO module is integrated in CMS MODX, connecting any HTML template is possible, and the admin panel is very convenient.
Inability to quickly master the system and start to fully use the code due to CMS tag syntax. Also, collective development of modules is not possible.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Acquia CMS vs. MODX, MODX has 29 user reviews and Acquia CMS has 9. The average star rating for MODX is 4.86 while Acquia CMS has an average rating of 3.77. MODX has more positive reviews than Acquia CMS. Comparing Acquia CMS vs. MODX reviews, MODX has stronger overall reviews.
Acquia CMS vs. MODX both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, Supported Content Types, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Systems/Administrative, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Acquia CMS vs. MODX, MODX offers more of the most popular features and tools than Acquia CMS.
In our pricing comparison of Acquia CMS vs. MODX, MODX's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to MODX's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Acquia CMS vs. MODX shows that Acquia CMS scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support. MODX scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin, but Acquia CMS has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
