In our comparison of Workable vs. ZipRecruiter, Workable is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Workable vs. ZipRecruiter, Workable has 82 user reviews and ZipRecruiter has 113. The average star rating for Workable is 4.45 while ZipRecruiter has an average rating of 4.15. Workable has more positive reviews than ZipRecruiter. Comparing Workable vs. ZipRecruiter reviews, Workable has stronger overall reviews.
Workable vs. ZipRecruiter both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Employee Management, Talent Management , Attendance Management, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Tax Forms, Customizable Items, Portal Types, File Management, Signature Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Workflow Automation, Data Migration, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Language & Speech. In our feature comparison of Workable vs. ZipRecruiter, Workable offers more of the most popular features and tools than ZipRecruiter.
In our pricing comparison of Workable vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ZipRecruiter's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Workable vs. ZipRecruiter shows that Workable scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. ZipRecruiter scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin, but Workable has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
