In our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
The application is easy to use and connects to our client networks in no time. The support team has also been extremely helpful whenever we have reached out.
Quick setup and connection, impressive support service, Remote Desktop access, stable connectivity
Application has bugs
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Versa SASE is a great product, in my opinion, as it integrates key technologies in a fluid manner that is necessary for a complete SASE solution. The fundamental requirements of a SASE system are effectively met when Firewall and SD-WAN are combined into a single interface. Nevertheless, a disadvantage is the ambiguity around Templates, which makes using these features difficult.
Reliable, inbuilt firewall, advanced internet access control
Some aspects are confusing to the user
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The application is easy to use and connects to our client networks in no time. The support team has also been extremely helpful whenever we have reached out.
Quick setup and connection, impressive support service, Remote Desktop access, stable connectivity
Application has bugs
Versa SASE is a great product, in my opinion, as it integrates key technologies in a fluid manner that is necessary for a complete SASE solution. The fundamental requirements of a SASE system are effectively met when Firewall and SD-WAN are combined into a single interface. Nevertheless, a disadvantage is the ambiguity around Templates, which makes using these features difficult.
Reliable, inbuilt firewall, advanced internet access control
Some aspects are confusing to the user
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE, Versa SASE has 3 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Versa SASE is 4.66 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Versa SASE has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE reviews, Versa SASE has stronger overall reviews.
ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Versa SASE.
In our pricing comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE, Versa SASE's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Versa SASE's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Versa SASE shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for learning curve. Versa SASE scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
