In our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Tufin, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
I love this product since it is simple to use and has assisted me in automating the establishment of policies and compliance reports. However, I would like to see additional customization choices, such as personalized dashboarding.
Easy to use and learn
Customization is not easy
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
We can now efficiently manage our firewall policies thanks to Tufin, a fantastic software. Its centralized interface makes managing devices from many networks simple, and its support service is top-notch. Since we started using Tufin in 2016, it has helped us save a significant amount of time and work. The cost is quite high but the advantages exceed the drawbacks.
Excellent support, centralized management and less worload
Expensive
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
I love this product since it is simple to use and has assisted me in automating the establishment of policies and compliance reports. However, I would like to see additional customization choices, such as personalized dashboarding.
Easy to use and learn
Customization is not easy
We can now efficiently manage our firewall policies thanks to Tufin, a fantastic software. Its centralized interface makes managing devices from many networks simple, and its support service is top-notch. Since we started using Tufin in 2016, it has helped us save a significant amount of time and work. The cost is quite high but the advantages exceed the drawbacks.
Excellent support, centralized management and less worload
Expensive
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Tufin, Tufin has 10 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Tufin is 4.6 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Tufin has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing ThreatConnect vs. Tufin reviews, Tufin has stronger overall reviews.
ThreatConnect vs. Tufin both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Tufin, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Tufin.
In our pricing comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Tufin, Tufin's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Tufin's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Tufin shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Tufin scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
