In our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown has 122 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for ThreatDown is 4.69 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. ThreatDown has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown reviews, ThreatDown has stronger overall reviews.
ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than ThreatDown.
In our pricing comparison of ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatDown's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. ThreatDown shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for learning curve, ease of admin. ThreatDown scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
