In our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. iboss, iboss is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ThreatConnect vs. iboss, iboss has 10 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for iboss is 4.1 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. iboss has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing ThreatConnect vs. iboss reviews, iboss has stronger overall reviews.
ThreatConnect vs. iboss both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ThreatConnect vs. iboss, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than iboss.
In our pricing comparison of ThreatConnect vs. iboss, iboss's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to iboss's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. iboss shows that iboss scores higher in usability for setup & support, quality of support. ThreatConnect scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin, but iboss has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
