In our comparison of Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
SumoLogic is a priceless tool for tracking patients' vital signs, sending out alarms in real time, and giving a cohesive picture of patient log data. It is perfect for crucial patient monitoring due to its simplicity of its integration. Although there is potential for growth in the documentation and log search speed, these are minor issues compared to the overall advantages of the product. SumoLogic is a vital tool for healthcare professionals since it successfully handles criteria-based alerting, dashboard analysis, real-time notifying, and individual patient tracking.
Ability to monitor a patient's health parameters with doctors, alerts the nearby nurses or hospital staff in case of any incident or emergency and unify patient log data in one place
Lack of documentation and searching through logs is laggy
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
This robust monitoring tool is excellent at tracking and preserving the functionality of databases and applications. However, additional precision and thorough code examples would enhance the documentation.
Can trace and track the health of systems
Documentation is not clear and code examples and implementation are very limited
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
SumoLogic is a priceless tool for tracking patients' vital signs, sending out alarms in real time, and giving a cohesive picture of patient log data. It is perfect for crucial patient monitoring due to its simplicity of its integration. Although there is potential for growth in the documentation and log search speed, these are minor issues compared to the overall advantages of the product. SumoLogic is a vital tool for healthcare professionals since it successfully handles criteria-based alerting, dashboard analysis, real-time notifying, and individual patient tracking.
Ability to monitor a patient's health parameters with doctors, alerts the nearby nurses or hospital staff in case of any incident or emergency and unify patient log data in one place
Lack of documentation and searching through logs is laggy
This robust monitoring tool is excellent at tracking and preserving the functionality of databases and applications. However, additional precision and thorough code examples would enhance the documentation.
Can trace and track the health of systems
Documentation is not clear and code examples and implementation are very limited
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect, Sumo Logic has 22 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Sumo Logic is 4.09 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Sumo Logic has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Sumo Logic has stronger overall reviews.
Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Sumo Logic.
In our pricing comparison of Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Sumo Logic vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. Sumo Logic scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
