In our comparison of Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
SentinelOne offers a lot of data and improved visibility into devices, including those that are not connected to our network. Exclusions for integration with other products, on the other hand, can be difficult to apply. Overall, the solution provides useful insights and an improved security posture.
Easy deployment and rapid adoption
No easy way to implement exclusions based on other products used
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
With the help of this software, one can easily verify what is installed on a network and find any security holes. It has aided in identifying possible threats and reducing the attack surface. If you're searching for a complete endpoint protection solution, I would strongly suggest it.
Simplified application and patch management, network visibility, threat detection
None
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
SentinelOne offers a lot of data and improved visibility into devices, including those that are not connected to our network. Exclusions for integration with other products, on the other hand, can be difficult to apply. Overall, the solution provides useful insights and an improved security posture.
Easy deployment and rapid adoption
No easy way to implement exclusions based on other products used
With the help of this software, one can easily verify what is installed on a network and find any security holes. It has aided in identifying possible threats and reducing the attack surface. If you're searching for a complete endpoint protection solution, I would strongly suggest it.
Simplified application and patch management, network visibility, threat detection
None
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, Singularity Cloud has 14 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Singularity Cloud is 4.57 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Singularity Cloud has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Singularity Cloud has stronger overall reviews.
Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Singularity Cloud.
In our pricing comparison of Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Singularity Cloud vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Singularity Cloud scores higher in quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
