In our comparison of SharePoint vs. Webdam, Webdam is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
We've used it to share documents and work together on projects, and it's been awesome for that. We've been able to collaborate really well and get stuff done. It has a bunch of different features to try out, but sometimes it's hard to use with other applications. It's been a big help for us in working together as a team.
I think the coolest feature is that you can create your own websites to keep your business or personal stuff organized and safe. It works best on Microsoft Edge and the shared space makes it easy to share documents and collaborate with others. You can even email links to stuff you want to share. The documents look really cool with all the visual features and graphics.
The bummer is that Microsoft is stopping the use of SharePoint and it's not clear how that will affect things. Also, this feature isn't free on a bunch of Microsoft editions and it's kinda tricky to use. You definitely need some help to get the hang of it.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
The product has enabled us to share data across multiple platforms and significantly improve collaboration within our organization.
I really appreciate how simple it is to set up and access files for sharing with both internal and external users, especially for projects where collaboration is key.
Sometimes, configuring permissions can be a bit confusing for end users. They may struggle to understand the different levels of access and require technical assistance.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
We've used it to share documents and work together on projects, and it's been awesome for that. We've been able to collaborate really well and get stuff done. It has a bunch of different features to try out, but sometimes it's hard to use with other applications. It's been a big help for us in working together as a team.
I think the coolest feature is that you can create your own websites to keep your business or personal stuff organized and safe. It works best on Microsoft Edge and the shared space makes it easy to share documents and collaborate with others. You can even email links to stuff you want to share. The documents look really cool with all the visual features and graphics.
The bummer is that Microsoft is stopping the use of SharePoint and it's not clear how that will affect things. Also, this feature isn't free on a bunch of Microsoft editions and it's kinda tricky to use. You definitely need some help to get the hang of it.
The product has enabled us to share data across multiple platforms and significantly improve collaboration within our organization.
I really appreciate how simple it is to set up and access files for sharing with both internal and external users, especially for projects where collaboration is key.
Sometimes, configuring permissions can be a bit confusing for end users. They may struggle to understand the different levels of access and require technical assistance.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of SharePoint vs. Webdam, SharePoint has 10 user reviews and Webdam has 24. The average star rating for SharePoint is 4.5 while Webdam has an average rating of 4. SharePoint has more positive reviews than Webdam. Comparing SharePoint vs. Webdam reviews, SharePoint has stronger overall reviews.
SharePoint vs. Webdam both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, File Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Sync/Refresh, Cybersecurity Features, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of SharePoint vs. Webdam, Webdam offers more of the most popular features and tools than SharePoint.
In our pricing comparison of SharePoint vs. Webdam, Webdam's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Webdam's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of SharePoint vs. Webdam shows that Webdam scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. SharePoint scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but Webdam has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
