In our comparison of Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Extrahop addresses the need for network traffic visibility, facilitating East-West network segmentation. With features like Extrahop Reveal(x) 360, it greatly assists in investigations and offers one-click containment during incidents, effectively reducing response time.
Extrahop offers comprehensive East-West network visibility and the ability to customize rules, empowering our security team with deep packet inspection capabilities. The packet capturing feature is particularly valuable for network forensics.
I believe Extrahop could benefit from extending its partnerships with threat researchers and vendors to enhance its intelligence feeds and database, enabling actionable insights for detections. Additionally, integration with tools like Tanium/SCCM, PAN firewalls, and other APIs would be beneficial.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
JavaScript can be used by ExtraHop, a network visibility and analytics platform, to gather custom metrics, actions, and notifications. This enables customers to customize the product to meet their own needs and go beyond the features included in the box.
Custom trigger setup and implementation with Javascript, network traffic monitoring and management, effective process to identify persistent issues
Dashboard customization process needs improvement, lack of region slideshows
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Extrahop addresses the need for network traffic visibility, facilitating East-West network segmentation. With features like Extrahop Reveal(x) 360, it greatly assists in investigations and offers one-click containment during incidents, effectively reducing response time.
Extrahop offers comprehensive East-West network visibility and the ability to customize rules, empowering our security team with deep packet inspection capabilities. The packet capturing feature is particularly valuable for network forensics.
I believe Extrahop could benefit from extending its partnerships with threat researchers and vendors to enhance its intelligence feeds and database, enabling actionable insights for detections. Additionally, integration with tools like Tanium/SCCM, PAN firewalls, and other APIs would be beneficial.
JavaScript can be used by ExtraHop, a network visibility and analytics platform, to gather custom metrics, actions, and notifications. This enables customers to customize the product to meet their own needs and go beyond the features included in the box.
Custom trigger setup and implementation with Javascript, network traffic monitoring and management, effective process to identify persistent issues
Dashboard customization process needs improvement, lack of region slideshows
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect, Reveal(x) 360 has 20 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Reveal(x) 360 is 4.3 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Reveal(x) 360 has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Reveal(x) 360 has stronger overall reviews.
Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Reveal(x) 360.
In our pricing comparison of Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Reveal(x) 360 vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Reveal(x) 360 scores higher in quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
