In our comparison of Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
One of the most effective threat intelligence products available, it covers a wide range of topics and has a variety of categories. Training and practical experience, however, could be enhanced. This product can assist customers interested in threat intelligence in lowering MTTD and MTTR.
Feature rich and efficient
Training given is not great
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Though the immense number of search results can occasionally be intimidating, Recorded Future's thorough and engaging data storage and organizing aids in my ability to recognize and counter dangers to both enterprises and individuals.
Data storing and organizing
Lots of search results
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
One of the most effective threat intelligence products available, it covers a wide range of topics and has a variety of categories. Training and practical experience, however, could be enhanced. This product can assist customers interested in threat intelligence in lowering MTTD and MTTR.
Feature rich and efficient
Training given is not great
Though the immense number of search results can occasionally be intimidating, Recorded Future's thorough and engaging data storage and organizing aids in my ability to recognize and counter dangers to both enterprises and individuals.
Data storing and organizing
Lots of search results
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect, Recorded Future has 9 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Recorded Future is 4.33 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Recorded Future has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Recorded Future has stronger overall reviews.
Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Recorded Future.
In our pricing comparison of Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for meets requirements, ease of admin. Recorded Future scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
