In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot, Webroot is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot, Webroot has 15 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Webroot is 4.53 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Webroot has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot reviews, Webroot has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webroot.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot, Webroot's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Webroot's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Webroot shows that Webroot scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. QRadar SIEM scores higher in quality of support, but Webroot has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
