In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown has 122 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for ThreatDown is 4.69 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. ThreatDown has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown reviews, ThreatDown has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than ThreatDown.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatDown's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. ThreatDown shows that ThreatDown scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in quality of support, ease of admin, but ThreatDown has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
