In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud, Singularity Cloud is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
SentinelOne offers a lot of data and improved visibility into devices, including those that are not connected to our network. Exclusions for integration with other products, on the other hand, can be difficult to apply. Overall, the solution provides useful insights and an improved security posture.
Easy deployment and rapid adoption
No easy way to implement exclusions based on other products used
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
With the help of this software, one can easily verify what is installed on a network and find any security holes. It has aided in identifying possible threats and reducing the attack surface. If you're searching for a complete endpoint protection solution, I would strongly suggest it.
Simplified application and patch management, network visibility, threat detection
None
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
SentinelOne offers a lot of data and improved visibility into devices, including those that are not connected to our network. Exclusions for integration with other products, on the other hand, can be difficult to apply. Overall, the solution provides useful insights and an improved security posture.
Easy deployment and rapid adoption
No easy way to implement exclusions based on other products used
With the help of this software, one can easily verify what is installed on a network and find any security holes. It has aided in identifying possible threats and reducing the attack surface. If you're searching for a complete endpoint protection solution, I would strongly suggest it.
Simplified application and patch management, network visibility, threat detection
None
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud, Singularity Cloud has 14 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Singularity Cloud is 4.57 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Singularity Cloud has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud reviews, Singularity Cloud has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Content Management. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Singularity Cloud.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud, Singularity Cloud's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Singularity Cloud's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Singularity Cloud shows that Singularity Cloud scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve. QRadar SIEM scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Singularity Cloud has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
