In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard, QRadar SIEM has 26 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for QRadar SIEM is 4.15 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. QRadar SIEM has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, QRadar SIEM has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Management, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
