In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
I highly recommend SecureWorks based on its proven effectiveness in safeguarding our servers and mitigating security risks. While the setup process may be complex, the protection it provides is well worth it.
Our servers have greatly benefited from the process monitor client (RedCloak) provided by SecureWorks. It successfully detected and thwarted attempted infiltrations resulting from an Apache vulnerability a couple of years ago. The IDS/IPS sensor has effectively protected our systems on multiple occasions, preventing various attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability scanner diligently scans our internal systems on a daily basis, generating informative reports. SecureWorks has delivered on its promises, as it has paid for itself by preventing numerous malicious attacks.
However, it is worth mentioning that the setup and customization process for the IDS/IPS and vulnerability scanning can be quite intricate. It would be advantageous if SecureWorks offered simpler options for common setups, reserving the complexity for advanced users or higher-end configurations.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
I highly recommend SecureWorks based on its proven effectiveness in safeguarding our servers and mitigating security risks. While the setup process may be complex, the protection it provides is well worth it.
Our servers have greatly benefited from the process monitor client (RedCloak) provided by SecureWorks. It successfully detected and thwarted attempted infiltrations resulting from an Apache vulnerability a couple of years ago. The IDS/IPS sensor has effectively protected our systems on multiple occasions, preventing various attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability scanner diligently scans our internal systems on a daily basis, generating informative reports. SecureWorks has delivered on its promises, as it has paid for itself by preventing numerous malicious attacks.
However, it is worth mentioning that the setup and customization process for the IDS/IPS and vulnerability scanning can be quite intricate. It would be advantageous if SecureWorks offered simpler options for common setups, reserving the complexity for advanced users or higher-end configurations.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
I highly recommend SecureWorks based on its proven effectiveness in safeguarding our servers and mitigating security risks. While the setup process may be complex, the protection it provides is well worth it.
Our servers have greatly benefited from the process monitor client (RedCloak) provided by SecureWorks. It successfully detected and thwarted attempted infiltrations resulting from an Apache vulnerability a couple of years ago. The IDS/IPS sensor has effectively protected our systems on multiple occasions, preventing various attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability scanner diligently scans our internal systems on a daily basis, generating informative reports. SecureWorks has delivered on its promises, as it has paid for itself by preventing numerous malicious attacks.
However, it is worth mentioning that the setup and customization process for the IDS/IPS and vulnerability scanning can be quite intricate. It would be advantageous if SecureWorks offered simpler options for common setups, reserving the complexity for advanced users or higher-end configurations.
I highly recommend SecureWorks based on its proven effectiveness in safeguarding our servers and mitigating security risks. While the setup process may be complex, the protection it provides is well worth it.
Our servers have greatly benefited from the process monitor client (RedCloak) provided by SecureWorks. It successfully detected and thwarted attempted infiltrations resulting from an Apache vulnerability a couple of years ago. The IDS/IPS sensor has effectively protected our systems on multiple occasions, preventing various attacks. Additionally, the vulnerability scanner diligently scans our internal systems on a daily basis, generating informative reports. SecureWorks has delivered on its promises, as it has paid for itself by preventing numerous malicious attacks.
However, it is worth mentioning that the setup and customization process for the IDS/IPS and vulnerability scanning can be quite intricate. It would be advantageous if SecureWorks offered simpler options for common setups, reserving the complexity for advanced users or higher-end configurations.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks, Secureworks has 2 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Secureworks is 5 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Secureworks has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks reviews, Secureworks has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Sync/Refresh, Collaboration Tools, Workflow Automation, Supported Technologies, Data Management, Compliance Accreditations, Disaster Recovery, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Customizable Items. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks, Secureworks offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks, Secureworks's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Secureworks's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Secureworks shows that QRadar SIEM scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Secureworks scores higher in learning curve, but QRadar SIEM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
