In our comparison of OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
N/A
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM has 26 user reviews and OmniNet has 0. The average star rating for QRadar SIEM is 4.15 while OmniNet has an average rating of 0.0. QRadar SIEM has more positive reviews than OmniNet. Comparing OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, QRadar SIEM has stronger overall reviews.
OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Device Management, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than OmniNet.
In our pricing comparison of OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of OmniNet vs. QRadar SIEM shows that QRadar SIEM scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. OmniNet scores higher in , but QRadar SIEM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
