In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. iboss, iboss is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. iboss, QRadar SIEM has 26 user reviews and iboss has 10. The average star rating for QRadar SIEM is 4.15 while iboss has an average rating of 4.1. QRadar SIEM has more positive reviews than iboss. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. iboss reviews, QRadar SIEM has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. iboss both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Data Management, Systems/Administrative. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. iboss, iboss offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. iboss, iboss's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to iboss's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. iboss shows that iboss scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in ease of use, quality of support, ease of admin, but iboss has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
