QAD vs. e2open: Which is Best? - Wheelhouse

QAD vs. e2open: Which is Best?

QAD vs. e2open Best Overall: e2open

In our comparison of QAD vs. e2open, e2open is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.

Quick Info

QAD Quick Info
WH Score:
7.7
Pricing Score:
7.0
Feature Score:
7.3
Usability Score:
7.9
Company Size:All Sizes
Platforms:
e2open Quick Info
WH Score:
8.0
Pricing Score:
7.6
Feature Score:
7.6
Usability Score:
7.4
Company Size:Mid Market, Large Market
Platforms:

Pricing

QAD Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

e2open Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

Features

QAD Features
  • Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP)
  • Material Requirement Planning (MRP)
  • Production Planning/Management
  • Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
  • Item Tracking & Traceability
  • Procurement/Replenishment Optimization
  • Purchasing
  • Kitting
  • Vendor/Supplier Management
  • Order/Delivery Management
  • Warehouse Management
  • Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO)
  • Yard Management
  • Customs Management
  • Revenue Management
e2open Features
  • Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP)
  • Material Requirement Planning (MRP)
  • Production Planning/Management
  • Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
  • Item Tracking & Traceability
  • Procurement/Replenishment Optimization
  • Purchasing
  • Kitting
  • Vendor/Supplier Management
  • Order/Delivery Management
  • Warehouse Management
  • Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO)
  • Yard Management
  • Customs Management
  • Revenue Management

Pros & Cons

QAD Pros & Cons
Pros
  • The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
Cons
  • Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
e2open Pros & Cons
Pros
  • The standout feature of this product is its extensive network, connecting with numerous carriers and partners worldwide
  • This vast network opens up a world of opportunities for global shipping and logistics.
Cons
  • While BlueJay offers many advantages, there have been occasional delays in the customer care service, which could be improved for better responsiveness and support.

Reviews

QAD Reviews
Top Favorable Review
T
Tony
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.

The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.

An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.

Top Critical Review
M
Melissa
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."

QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.

Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.

e2open Reviews
Top Favorable Review
R
Robert
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

The product effectively addresses the challenges associated with shipping and movement within your company. With its extensive network and global reach, it provides a seamless and efficient solution for shipping items globally. By leveraging this product, you can streamline your shipping processes, expand your reach, and enhance your logistics capabilities.

The standout feature of this product is its extensive network, connecting with numerous carriers and partners worldwide. This vast network opens up a world of opportunities for global shipping and logistics.

Regrettably, the only downside is not having connected with this product sooner. Recognizing its benefits and capabilities, you wish you had started using it earlier.

Top Critical Review
M
Miranda
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

BlueJay solves the problem of limited shipping options by providing access to a vast network of shipping partners. This allows for smoother operations, hassle-free tracking, and increased efficiency in the shipping process. Overall, the software has been reliable, with no major problems faced during usage.

The standout feature of BlueJay is its extensive network within the shipping fraternity. The wide reach and connectivity among various shipping partners greatly benefit users, enabling seamless operations and efficient logistics.

While BlueJay offers many advantages, there have been occasional delays in the customer care service, which could be improved for better responsiveness and support.

Alternatives

QAD Alternatives
e2open Alternatives
Add to Compare

Add suggested to comparison

QAD vs. e2open: Detailed Comparison

QAD vs. e2open Top Ratings & Reviews: e2open

In our rating and review comparison of QAD vs. e2open, e2open has 7 user reviews and QAD has 8. The average star rating for e2open is 3.85 while QAD has an average rating of 3.37. e2open has more positive reviews than QAD. Comparing QAD vs. e2open reviews, e2open has stronger overall reviews.

QAD vs. e2open Best Features & Functionality: e2open

QAD vs. e2open both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Shipping & Logistics Management, Reporting & Analytics, Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Route Management, Integration Options. In our feature comparison of QAD vs. e2open, e2open offers more of the most popular features and tools than QAD.

QAD vs. e2open Best Pricing: e2open

In our pricing comparison of QAD vs. e2open, e2open's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to e2open's starting cost of N/A/month.

QAD vs. e2open Best Usability: QAD

Our comparison of QAD vs. e2open shows that QAD scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. e2open scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but QAD has the best scores overall for system usability.

The right software for your business

Get your personalized recommendations now.