In our comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Although Prisma Cloud is a flexible CSPM with strengths in container security and multi-cloud, its limited depth and awkward UI may turn off seasoned users. Whilst it's a fantastic basic security and compliance starter kit, take into account its limits before scaling up.
Multi-cloud support, Out-of-box compliance, Container security
Steep learning curve
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Prisma Cloud resolves challenges associated with managing cloud infrastructure from both a security and operations perspective. The product provides administrative ease and comprehensive security measures, enabling organizations to efficiently govern and safeguard their cloud resources.
One of the standout features of Prisma Cloud is its support for multiple cloud tenants. This capability allows for efficient management and security across diverse cloud environments. Additionally, the ease of integration adds to the overall appeal of the product.
A drawback is that the cloud hosting is not available in India, which may impact latency or compliance requirements for users in that region. Additionally, the IAM controls could benefit from additional features to enhance functionality and customization.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Although Prisma Cloud is a flexible CSPM with strengths in container security and multi-cloud, its limited depth and awkward UI may turn off seasoned users. Whilst it's a fantastic basic security and compliance starter kit, take into account its limits before scaling up.
Multi-cloud support, Out-of-box compliance, Container security
Steep learning curve
Prisma Cloud resolves challenges associated with managing cloud infrastructure from both a security and operations perspective. The product provides administrative ease and comprehensive security measures, enabling organizations to efficiently govern and safeguard their cloud resources.
One of the standout features of Prisma Cloud is its support for multiple cloud tenants. This capability allows for efficient management and security across diverse cloud environments. Additionally, the ease of integration adds to the overall appeal of the product.
A drawback is that the cloud hosting is not available in India, which may impact latency or compliance requirements for users in that region. Additionally, the IAM controls could benefit from additional features to enhance functionality and customization.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, Prisma Cloud has 16 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Prisma Cloud is 4 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Prisma Cloud has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Prisma Cloud has stronger overall reviews.
Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Prisma Cloud.
In our pricing comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Prisma Cloud scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
