In our comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Although Prisma Cloud is a flexible CSPM with strengths in container security and multi-cloud, its limited depth and awkward UI may turn off seasoned users. Whilst it's a fantastic basic security and compliance starter kit, take into account its limits before scaling up.
Multi-cloud support, Out-of-box compliance, Container security
Steep learning curve
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Prisma Cloud resolves challenges associated with managing cloud infrastructure from both a security and operations perspective. The product provides administrative ease and comprehensive security measures, enabling organizations to efficiently govern and safeguard their cloud resources.
One of the standout features of Prisma Cloud is its support for multiple cloud tenants. This capability allows for efficient management and security across diverse cloud environments. Additionally, the ease of integration adds to the overall appeal of the product.
A drawback is that the cloud hosting is not available in India, which may impact latency or compliance requirements for users in that region. Additionally, the IAM controls could benefit from additional features to enhance functionality and customization.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Although Prisma Cloud is a flexible CSPM with strengths in container security and multi-cloud, its limited depth and awkward UI may turn off seasoned users. Whilst it's a fantastic basic security and compliance starter kit, take into account its limits before scaling up.
Multi-cloud support, Out-of-box compliance, Container security
Steep learning curve
Prisma Cloud resolves challenges associated with managing cloud infrastructure from both a security and operations perspective. The product provides administrative ease and comprehensive security measures, enabling organizations to efficiently govern and safeguard their cloud resources.
One of the standout features of Prisma Cloud is its support for multiple cloud tenants. This capability allows for efficient management and security across diverse cloud environments. Additionally, the ease of integration adds to the overall appeal of the product.
A drawback is that the cloud hosting is not available in India, which may impact latency or compliance requirements for users in that region. Additionally, the IAM controls could benefit from additional features to enhance functionality and customization.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM has 26 user reviews and Prisma Cloud has 16. The average star rating for QRadar SIEM is 4.15 while Prisma Cloud has an average rating of 4. QRadar SIEM has more positive reviews than Prisma Cloud. Comparing Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, QRadar SIEM has stronger overall reviews.
Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Cloud Management, Network Management, Application Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Container Management, Workflow Automation, Third-Party Integrations, Reminders/Alerts, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, Prisma Cloud offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Prisma Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM shows that QRadar SIEM scores higher in usability for ease of admin. Prisma Cloud scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but QRadar SIEM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
