In our comparison of Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Webroot has 15. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Webroot has an average rating of 4.53. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Webroot. Comparing Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webroot.
In our pricing comparison of Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot, Webroot's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Webroot's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Perimeter 81 vs. Webroot shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for setup & support, quality of support. Webroot scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
