Perimeter 81 vs. Tenable One: Which is Best? - Wheelhouse

Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.

The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.

There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.

The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.

One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.

There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.

Tenable.IO effectively addresses the challenge of understanding risks and prioritizing vulnerability management. By utilizing the product, organizations can gain valuable insights into their security posture, enabling them to focus on mitigating the most critical vulnerabilities and reducing overall risk exposure.

I appreciate that Tenable.IO offers exceptional reporting and dashboard capabilities, which make it easy to comprehend and prioritize remediation efforts based on risk assessment.

Although not a specific issue with Tenable.IO itself, it is worth noting that better results can be achieved using agents for vulnerability detection compared to active scanning.

Tenable.io effectively addresses the challenges of scanning, reporting, and monitoring the progress of remediation efforts. Its straightforward setup allows for easy scheduling, allowing Tenable to perform its scanning tasks autonomously. While it is still advisable to review the results in the console, scheduled reports are also available for convenience.

I appreciate that Tenable.io is a reliable and effective solution that seamlessly performs its intended functions. It offers the flexibility to deploy internal scanners or utilize their cloud-hosted scanners for external perimeter scanning. Tenable consistently stays updated with current events, regularly providing new plugins to detect the latest vulnerabilities.

While Tenable.io continually works on expanding its functionality, some tweaks are being made to the console. This includes the addition of more reporting, dashboards, and remediation scans. Additionally, the presence of both old and new methods of tagging and grouping can be confusing for new users. However, I believe efforts are being made to address this issue and streamline the process.