In our comparison of PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter, PeopleFluent is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
PeopleFluent is better than any other available ATS I have used when hiring for the past 16 years. It is extremely simple to use and teach a new hiring manager or recruiter to operate it. Also, setting filter options is simple and the support team is awesome.
Simple to learn and teach someone the software.
The process of posting a role has very many steps
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
An admin is needed to perform daily operations in this LMS, unlike others like redbird, saba, and cornerstone that only need an individual about once every week to run it. It could, however, be suitable for a larger company but currently, software's are optimized. The sole benefit is that they're affordable than others, and that they're restructuring their software and requesting customers to assist them invent their software. It may be later be functional for a manufacturing company.
Conduct individual research depending on your business
Integration is simple
An analyst is required
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
PeopleFluent is better than any other available ATS I have used when hiring for the past 16 years. It is extremely simple to use and teach a new hiring manager or recruiter to operate it. Also, setting filter options is simple and the support team is awesome.
Simple to learn and teach someone the software.
The process of posting a role has very many steps
An admin is needed to perform daily operations in this LMS, unlike others like redbird, saba, and cornerstone that only need an individual about once every week to run it. It could, however, be suitable for a larger company but currently, software's are optimized. The sole benefit is that they're affordable than others, and that they're restructuring their software and requesting customers to assist them invent their software. It may be later be functional for a manufacturing company.
Conduct individual research depending on your business
Integration is simple
An analyst is required
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter has 112 user reviews and PeopleFluent has 19. The average star rating for ZipRecruiter is 4.14 while PeopleFluent has an average rating of 4.05. ZipRecruiter has more positive reviews than PeopleFluent. Comparing PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter reviews, ZipRecruiter has stronger overall reviews.
PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Human Resources (HR) Features, Supported Channels, Signature Management, Project Management Features, Data Management, Reporting & Analytics, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter, PeopleFluent offers more of the most popular features and tools than ZipRecruiter.
In our pricing comparison of PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ZipRecruiter's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of PeopleFluent vs. ZipRecruiter shows that PeopleFluent scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support. ZipRecruiter scores higher in setup & support, ease of admin, but PeopleFluent has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
