In our comparison of Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Our risk management procedures have been expedited by the highly scalable, adaptable, and user-friendly wireless GRC platform Onspring, which has also given us a central repository for all of our risk-related data. Although there is room for improvement in terms of content libraries, the platform has met our demands for managing risks in a number of applications.
Scalable, flexible and user friendly
Limited content
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Onspring is a feature-rich platform with an advanced API, comprehensive security features, and admin and reporting capabilities. But because of its generic character, it might be less useful for certain jobs, such handling populations, emails, and complicated policies with several cadences. Although our company with over 70 employees uses it for compliance certifications, its restrictions keep us from fully utilizing it for other purposes.
Strong reporting and admin features, modern API , versatile and security features
Requires advanced functions for tasks that should be native to the system
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Our risk management procedures have been expedited by the highly scalable, adaptable, and user-friendly wireless GRC platform Onspring, which has also given us a central repository for all of our risk-related data. Although there is room for improvement in terms of content libraries, the platform has met our demands for managing risks in a number of applications.
Scalable, flexible and user friendly
Limited content
Onspring is a feature-rich platform with an advanced API, comprehensive security features, and admin and reporting capabilities. But because of its generic character, it might be less useful for certain jobs, such handling populations, emails, and complicated policies with several cadences. Although our company with over 70 employees uses it for compliance certifications, its restrictions keep us from fully utilizing it for other purposes.
Strong reporting and admin features, modern API , versatile and security features
Requires advanced functions for tasks that should be native to the system
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard, Onspring has 18 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for Onspring is 4.5 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. Onspring has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, Onspring has stronger overall reviews.
Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Management, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than Onspring.
In our pricing comparison of Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Onspring vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Onspring scores higher in meets requirements, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
