In our comparison of Onspring vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Our risk management procedures have been expedited by the highly scalable, adaptable, and user-friendly wireless GRC platform Onspring, which has also given us a central repository for all of our risk-related data. Although there is room for improvement in terms of content libraries, the platform has met our demands for managing risks in a number of applications.
Scalable, flexible and user friendly
Limited content
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
Onspring is a feature-rich platform with an advanced API, comprehensive security features, and admin and reporting capabilities. But because of its generic character, it might be less useful for certain jobs, such handling populations, emails, and complicated policies with several cadences. Although our company with over 70 employees uses it for compliance certifications, its restrictions keep us from fully utilizing it for other purposes.
Strong reporting and admin features, modern API , versatile and security features
Requires advanced functions for tasks that should be native to the system
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Our risk management procedures have been expedited by the highly scalable, adaptable, and user-friendly wireless GRC platform Onspring, which has also given us a central repository for all of our risk-related data. Although there is room for improvement in terms of content libraries, the platform has met our demands for managing risks in a number of applications.
Scalable, flexible and user friendly
Limited content
Onspring is a feature-rich platform with an advanced API, comprehensive security features, and admin and reporting capabilities. But because of its generic character, it might be less useful for certain jobs, such handling populations, emails, and complicated policies with several cadences. Although our company with over 70 employees uses it for compliance certifications, its restrictions keep us from fully utilizing it for other purposes.
Strong reporting and admin features, modern API , versatile and security features
Requires advanced functions for tasks that should be native to the system
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Onspring vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Onspring has 18. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Onspring has an average rating of 4.5. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Onspring. Comparing Onspring vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Onspring vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Network Management, Device Management, Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Onspring vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Onspring.
In our pricing comparison of Onspring vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Onspring vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Onspring scores higher in meets requirements, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
