In our comparison of OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product prioritizes cloud-based operations and allows for customization to meet specific needs.
The product addresses consent and preference management in accordance with compliance regulations such as GDPR, which includes the right to be forgotten
Although the interface is satisfactory, there is room for improvement
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
The software offers a sensible, well-informed, and cogent strategy for obtaining and upholding compliance with norms like ISO 27001. It drastically reduces the amount of time and work required to structure and achieve the standard. The reporting and dashboards should still be improved, and the automation is good but not yet amazing.
Time saving, solves the problem of automating the compliance process for ISO 27001 and great compliance management
Automation and reporting could improve
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The product prioritizes cloud-based operations and allows for customization to meet specific needs.
The product addresses consent and preference management in accordance with compliance regulations such as GDPR, which includes the right to be forgotten
Although the interface is satisfactory, there is room for improvement
The software offers a sensible, well-informed, and cogent strategy for obtaining and upholding compliance with norms like ISO 27001. It drastically reduces the amount of time and work required to structure and achieve the standard. The reporting and dashboards should still be improved, and the automation is good but not yet amazing.
Time saving, solves the problem of automating the compliance process for ISO 27001 and great compliance management
Automation and reporting could improve
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect, OneTrust has 12 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for OneTrust is 4.08 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. OneTrust has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect reviews, OneTrust has stronger overall reviews.
OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than OneTrust.
In our pricing comparison of OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of OneTrust vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. OneTrust scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
