In our comparison of Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard, Nucleus has 17 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for Nucleus is 4.29 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. Nucleus has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, Nucleus has stronger overall reviews.
Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Management, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than Nucleus.
In our pricing comparison of Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Nucleus vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Nucleus scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
