In our comparison of Nucleus vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Nucleus vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint has 15 user reviews and Nucleus has 17. The average star rating for Proofpoint is 4.66 while Nucleus has an average rating of 4.29. Proofpoint has more positive reviews than Nucleus. Comparing Nucleus vs. Proofpoint reviews, Proofpoint has stronger overall reviews.
Nucleus vs. Proofpoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Application Management, Cloud Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Nucleus vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than Nucleus.
In our pricing comparison of Nucleus vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Proofpoint's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Nucleus vs. Proofpoint shows that Proofpoint scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin. Nucleus scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, but Proofpoint has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
