In our comparison of N-central vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product has made it easier for me to implement the defined processes in n-able.
I find the Automation manager easy to use. The patching system has improved, but there is still room for improvement in many areas.
I am not satisfied with the reporting system, and I wish I had more control over the scripts. There are frequent failures in the windows feature updates. It would be better if there were more options for filtering specific approved missing patches.
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Setting up this RMM was quite easy! After it's operational, everything happens with ease. This is RMM done correctly; forget clumsy interfaces and perplexing menu systems. A gold star is also due to the support staff, who are consistently helpful and quick to reply.There is room for improvement in the documentation, but the work is being done.
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
The product has made it easier for me to implement the defined processes in n-able.
I find the Automation manager easy to use. The patching system has improved, but there is still room for improvement in many areas.
I am not satisfied with the reporting system, and I wish I had more control over the scripts. There are frequent failures in the windows feature updates. It would be better if there were more options for filtering specific approved missing patches.
Setting up this RMM was quite easy! After it's operational, everything happens with ease. This is RMM done correctly; forget clumsy interfaces and perplexing menu systems. A gold star is also due to the support staff, who are consistently helpful and quick to reply.There is room for improvement in the documentation, but the work is being done.
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of N-central vs. SecurityScorecard, N-central has 12 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for N-central is 4.08 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. N-central has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing N-central vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, N-central has stronger overall reviews.
N-central vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Management, Reminders/Alerts, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of N-central vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than N-central.
In our pricing comparison of N-central vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of N-central vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. N-central scores higher in meets requirements, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
