In our comparison of N-central vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
The product has made it easier for me to implement the defined processes in n-able.
I find the Automation manager easy to use. The patching system has improved, but there is still room for improvement in many areas.
I am not satisfied with the reporting system, and I wish I had more control over the scripts. There are frequent failures in the windows feature updates. It would be better if there were more options for filtering specific approved missing patches.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
Setting up this RMM was quite easy! After it's operational, everything happens with ease. This is RMM done correctly; forget clumsy interfaces and perplexing menu systems. A gold star is also due to the support staff, who are consistently helpful and quick to reply.There is room for improvement in the documentation, but the work is being done.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
The product has made it easier for me to implement the defined processes in n-able.
I find the Automation manager easy to use. The patching system has improved, but there is still room for improvement in many areas.
I am not satisfied with the reporting system, and I wish I had more control over the scripts. There are frequent failures in the windows feature updates. It would be better if there were more options for filtering specific approved missing patches.
Setting up this RMM was quite easy! After it's operational, everything happens with ease. This is RMM done correctly; forget clumsy interfaces and perplexing menu systems. A gold star is also due to the support staff, who are consistently helpful and quick to reply.There is room for improvement in the documentation, but the work is being done.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of N-central vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and N-central has 12. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while N-central has an average rating of 4.08. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than N-central. Comparing N-central vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
N-central vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Sync/Refresh, Device Management, Network Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of N-central vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than N-central.
In our pricing comparison of N-central vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of N-central vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for learning curve, quality of support. N-central scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
