In our comparison of MODX vs. Webdam, MODX is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The SEO of the platform is great. Ability of the template located on the site beneath her guidance for a limited number of hours to be changed past recognition by my team members.
Inability of staff without programming skills to completely restructure the tool by themselves. Figures in your account are lacking.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
The SEO module is integrated in CMS MODX, connecting any HTML template is possible, and the admin panel is very convenient.
Inability to quickly master the system and start to fully use the code due to CMS tag syntax. Also, collective development of modules is not possible.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
The SEO of the platform is great. Ability of the template located on the site beneath her guidance for a limited number of hours to be changed past recognition by my team members.
Inability of staff without programming skills to completely restructure the tool by themselves. Figures in your account are lacking.
The SEO module is integrated in CMS MODX, connecting any HTML template is possible, and the admin panel is very convenient.
Inability to quickly master the system and start to fully use the code due to CMS tag syntax. Also, collective development of modules is not possible.
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of MODX vs. Webdam, MODX has 29 user reviews and Webdam has 24. The average star rating for MODX is 4.86 while Webdam has an average rating of 4. MODX has more positive reviews than Webdam. Comparing MODX vs. Webdam reviews, MODX has stronger overall reviews.
MODX vs. Webdam both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, Supported Content Types, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Systems/Administrative, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of MODX vs. Webdam, MODX offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webdam.
In our pricing comparison of MODX vs. Webdam, Webdam's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Webdam's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of MODX vs. Webdam shows that Webdam scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin. MODX scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, but Webdam has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
