In our comparison of Lookout vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
It effectively identifies and defends against potential viruses, addressing a critical concern in mobile security.
Affordability and ease of access to the application.
I found the interface a bit cluttered and believe it could benefit from simplification to enhance user experience.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Lookout has provided us with significant benefits by integrating all our mobile cybersecurity needs, data backups, device tracking, and more into one efficient platform. It has become an essential tool for every member of our organization, ensuring the security and protection of our devices and data.
I appreciate Lookout's comprehensive approach to cybersecurity, specifically its focus on mobile security to prevent various threats and cyber attacks. It impressed me how quickly we were able to set it up and adapt to its usage. Lookout operates seamlessly in the background without interfering with any activities, while keeping us informed and alerting us to any vulnerabilities, allowing us to take timely action and prevent damage.
The only drawback I found is that it is a paid application. However, the value it provides in efficiently fulfilling multiple cybersecurity and data-related functions within a single platform justifies the cost. It eliminates the need for using multiple applications to address different security needs.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
It effectively identifies and defends against potential viruses, addressing a critical concern in mobile security.
Affordability and ease of access to the application.
I found the interface a bit cluttered and believe it could benefit from simplification to enhance user experience.
Lookout has provided us with significant benefits by integrating all our mobile cybersecurity needs, data backups, device tracking, and more into one efficient platform. It has become an essential tool for every member of our organization, ensuring the security and protection of our devices and data.
I appreciate Lookout's comprehensive approach to cybersecurity, specifically its focus on mobile security to prevent various threats and cyber attacks. It impressed me how quickly we were able to set it up and adapt to its usage. Lookout operates seamlessly in the background without interfering with any activities, while keeping us informed and alerting us to any vulnerabilities, allowing us to take timely action and prevent damage.
The only drawback I found is that it is a paid application. However, the value it provides in efficiently fulfilling multiple cybersecurity and data-related functions within a single platform justifies the cost. It eliminates the need for using multiple applications to address different security needs.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Lookout vs. ThreatConnect, Lookout has 27 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Lookout is 4.66 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Lookout has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Lookout vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Lookout has stronger overall reviews.
Lookout vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Lookout vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Lookout.
In our pricing comparison of Lookout vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Lookout vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Lookout scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
