In our comparison of LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM, LastPass is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
LastPass with its Autofill function coupled with its robust password generation tool consistently provides the correct credentials and seamlessly updates them when passwords are changed.
It provides a critical service by flagging compromised passwords, enhancing my overall security posture.
I do have reservations about its history of security breaches.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
LastPass has made my life easier by getting rid of the need to keep pages of password notes, which saves me a lot of time and hassle.
I love how easy it is to sign in to apps and websites on all my devices using LastPass.
I haven't found any downsides to using LastPass so far.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
LastPass with its Autofill function coupled with its robust password generation tool consistently provides the correct credentials and seamlessly updates them when passwords are changed.
It provides a critical service by flagging compromised passwords, enhancing my overall security posture.
I do have reservations about its history of security breaches.
LastPass has made my life easier by getting rid of the need to keep pages of password notes, which saves me a lot of time and hassle.
I love how easy it is to sign in to apps and websites on all my devices using LastPass.
I haven't found any downsides to using LastPass so far.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM, LastPass has 11 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for LastPass is 4.72 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. LastPass has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, LastPass has stronger overall reviews.
LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Reporting & Analytics, Third-Party Integrations, Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Collaboration Tools, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM, LastPass offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of LastPass vs. QRadar SIEM shows that LastPass scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve. QRadar SIEM scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but LastPass has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
