In our comparison of Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The feature set to safeguard your devices both offline and online are extremely good.
Its performance is awful, it functions slowly, and it’s quite bulky.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
I did have a wonderful experience with Kaspersky that’s the reason I would recommend it to all.
It is undoubtedly the best antivirus app ever. Reliability, frequent updates, alerts it provides, scanning, and ease of use all together provide peace of mind.
No cons so far. The cost is a bit high.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The feature set to safeguard your devices both offline and online are extremely good.
Its performance is awful, it functions slowly, and it’s quite bulky.
I did have a wonderful experience with Kaspersky that’s the reason I would recommend it to all.
It is undoubtedly the best antivirus app ever. Reliability, frequent updates, alerts it provides, scanning, and ease of use all together provide peace of mind.
No cons so far. The cost is a bit high.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect, Kaspersky Enterprise Security has 22 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Kaspersky Enterprise Security is 4.68 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Kaspersky Enterprise Security has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Kaspersky Enterprise Security has stronger overall reviews.
Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Kaspersky Enterprise Security.
In our pricing comparison of Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Kaspersky Enterprise Security vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. Kaspersky Enterprise Security scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.