In our comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Juniper routers highlights their impressive size and visual design, scalability, integration, reliability, and the extensive features they offer. Although their syntax may be a bit complicated and they require careful handling, Juniper routers are an excellent choice for enterprise networks. They solve various problems by catering to both enterprises and non-commercial solutions, providing aggregated and integrated services, offering a secure Linux-based system, supporting diverse applications, and streamlining operations through automation. In conclusion, I highly recommend Juniper routers for anyone seeking a reliable and powerful networking solution.
I really appreciate the size and visual design of the Juniper routers. They have a sleek and appealing appearance. Additionally, the routers are scalable, integrated, and reliable, which is a major advantage. When it comes to Enterprise Networks, Juniper routers are an excellent choice. They offer a good range of features that cater to the needs of enterprise-level networks. Moreover, the Junos operating system is impressive and provides a seamless user experience.
I find the syntax of Juniper routers a bit complicated compared to other vendors. It may require some additional effort to get familiar with the syntax. Another aspect to consider is that Juniper routers are more sensitive, so they need to be handled with care. Proper precautions should be taken to ensure their longevity and performance.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
Juniper Mist Wireless has been a tremendous help to us in resolving wireless issues and addressing common WiFi problems. The Mist AL solution has significantly improved the efficiency of our wireless devices and expanded WiFi coverage.
One of the aspects I appreciate the most about Juniper is their range of products, including SRX, MX, QFX, and EX series, all running on JUNOS OS. The config rollback feature has proven to be invaluable for network engineers and administrators. Additionally, working with JUNOS is remarkably convenient and straightforward, thanks to the set command, which simplifies network configuration.
While Juniper's network products are highly effective, some of them can be on the pricier side compared to the value they provide.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Juniper routers highlights their impressive size and visual design, scalability, integration, reliability, and the extensive features they offer. Although their syntax may be a bit complicated and they require careful handling, Juniper routers are an excellent choice for enterprise networks. They solve various problems by catering to both enterprises and non-commercial solutions, providing aggregated and integrated services, offering a secure Linux-based system, supporting diverse applications, and streamlining operations through automation. In conclusion, I highly recommend Juniper routers for anyone seeking a reliable and powerful networking solution.
I really appreciate the size and visual design of the Juniper routers. They have a sleek and appealing appearance. Additionally, the routers are scalable, integrated, and reliable, which is a major advantage. When it comes to Enterprise Networks, Juniper routers are an excellent choice. They offer a good range of features that cater to the needs of enterprise-level networks. Moreover, the Junos operating system is impressive and provides a seamless user experience.
I find the syntax of Juniper routers a bit complicated compared to other vendors. It may require some additional effort to get familiar with the syntax. Another aspect to consider is that Juniper routers are more sensitive, so they need to be handled with care. Proper precautions should be taken to ensure their longevity and performance.
Juniper Mist Wireless has been a tremendous help to us in resolving wireless issues and addressing common WiFi problems. The Mist AL solution has significantly improved the efficiency of our wireless devices and expanded WiFi coverage.
One of the aspects I appreciate the most about Juniper is their range of products, including SRX, MX, QFX, and EX series, all running on JUNOS OS. The config rollback feature has proven to be invaluable for network engineers and administrators. Additionally, working with JUNOS is remarkably convenient and straightforward, thanks to the set command, which simplifies network configuration.
While Juniper's network products are highly effective, some of them can be on the pricier side compared to the value they provide.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Juniper Networks has 7. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Juniper Networks has an average rating of 4.28. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Juniper Networks. Comparing Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Network Management, Device Management, Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Juniper Networks.
In our pricing comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Juniper Networks scores higher in ease of use, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
