In our comparison of JobScore vs. Workable, Workable is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Ease of use, user-friendly, Candidate flow and templates can be customized, helpdesk rep is always alert and ready to respond to our queries positively. They are kind enough to let you know how to take the fullest advantage of the features you are aren't aware of.
Restricting user type is impossible, such as disabling managers to forward candidates not meeting the set criteria.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
According to a newly introduced feature, the resume has become a part of the job application but it doesn't let the candidate know it. It is something really appreciated by our company. It asked for the resumes of the current employees too. After negotiating this issue to the customer service rep, I was told, though I am a huge customer of their, to wait for a while which for no surprise to me continued for several months but ultimately it was done.
First we started with their free plan about which, I don't know still exists or not. It suited to our company's needs very well because we were not getting CVs through an email address. Further, we allocated different departs to concerned managers.
Bugs in upgrades, customer support is not responsive enough, their turnaround time is 48 hours which is pathetic. No distinction or respect for high paying customers.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
Ease of use, user-friendly, Candidate flow and templates can be customized, helpdesk rep is always alert and ready to respond to our queries positively. They are kind enough to let you know how to take the fullest advantage of the features you are aren't aware of.
Restricting user type is impossible, such as disabling managers to forward candidates not meeting the set criteria.
According to a newly introduced feature, the resume has become a part of the job application but it doesn't let the candidate know it. It is something really appreciated by our company. It asked for the resumes of the current employees too. After negotiating this issue to the customer service rep, I was told, though I am a huge customer of their, to wait for a while which for no surprise to me continued for several months but ultimately it was done.
First we started with their free plan about which, I don't know still exists or not. It suited to our company's needs very well because we were not getting CVs through an email address. Further, we allocated different departs to concerned managers.
Bugs in upgrades, customer support is not responsive enough, their turnaround time is 48 hours which is pathetic. No distinction or respect for high paying customers.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of JobScore vs. Workable, Workable has 82 user reviews and JobScore has 20. The average star rating for Workable is 4.45 while JobScore has an average rating of 4.2. Workable has more positive reviews than JobScore. Comparing JobScore vs. Workable reviews, Workable has stronger overall reviews.
JobScore vs. Workable both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Employee Management, Talent Management , Attendance Management, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Tax Forms, Customizable Items, Portal Types, File Management, Signature Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Workflow Automation, Data Migration, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Language & Speech. In our feature comparison of JobScore vs. Workable, Workable offers more of the most popular features and tools than JobScore.
In our pricing comparison of JobScore vs. Workable, Workable's pricing starts at $149/month and is more affordable compared to Workable's starting cost of $149/month.
Our comparison of JobScore vs. Workable shows that JobScore scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Workable scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, but JobScore has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
