In our comparison of JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Ease of use, user-friendly, Candidate flow and templates can be customized, helpdesk rep is always alert and ready to respond to our queries positively. They are kind enough to let you know how to take the fullest advantage of the features you are aren't aware of.
Restricting user type is impossible, such as disabling managers to forward candidates not meeting the set criteria.
Its user-friendly interface and various customization options make it a valuable asset for any organization.
Whether it's posting jobs for external or internal candidates, the process is incredibly straightforward. The option to control the visibility of job postings, whether public or private, adds a fantastic level of flexibility.
None
According to a newly introduced feature, the resume has become a part of the job application but it doesn't let the candidate know it. It is something really appreciated by our company. It asked for the resumes of the current employees too. After negotiating this issue to the customer service rep, I was told, though I am a huge customer of their, to wait for a while which for no surprise to me continued for several months but ultimately it was done.
First we started with their free plan about which, I don't know still exists or not. It suited to our company's needs very well because we were not getting CVs through an email address. Further, we allocated different departs to concerned managers.
Bugs in upgrades, customer support is not responsive enough, their turnaround time is 48 hours which is pathetic. No distinction or respect for high paying customers.
It has brought efficiency and structure to these essential aspects of our operations.
This solution provides a comprehensive platform for managing performance management and salary review efficiently.
There are instances where the platform is not as user-friendly as one would hope. Occasional mistakes can occur, which can be a source of frustration.
Ease of use, user-friendly, Candidate flow and templates can be customized, helpdesk rep is always alert and ready to respond to our queries positively. They are kind enough to let you know how to take the fullest advantage of the features you are aren't aware of.
Restricting user type is impossible, such as disabling managers to forward candidates not meeting the set criteria.
According to a newly introduced feature, the resume has become a part of the job application but it doesn't let the candidate know it. It is something really appreciated by our company. It asked for the resumes of the current employees too. After negotiating this issue to the customer service rep, I was told, though I am a huge customer of their, to wait for a while which for no surprise to me continued for several months but ultimately it was done.
First we started with their free plan about which, I don't know still exists or not. It suited to our company's needs very well because we were not getting CVs through an email address. Further, we allocated different departs to concerned managers.
Bugs in upgrades, customer support is not responsive enough, their turnaround time is 48 hours which is pathetic. No distinction or respect for high paying customers.
Its user-friendly interface and various customization options make it a valuable asset for any organization.
Whether it's posting jobs for external or internal candidates, the process is incredibly straightforward. The option to control the visibility of job postings, whether public or private, adds a fantastic level of flexibility.
None
It has brought efficiency and structure to these essential aspects of our operations.
This solution provides a comprehensive platform for managing performance management and salary review efficiently.
There are instances where the platform is not as user-friendly as one would hope. Occasional mistakes can occur, which can be a source of frustration.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, JobScore has 19 user reviews and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 13. The average star rating for JobScore is 4.26 while SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has an average rating of 4. JobScore has more positive reviews than SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting. Comparing JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting reviews, JobScore has stronger overall reviews.
JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Supported Channels, Language & Speech, Reporting & Analytics, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting offers more of the most popular features and tools than JobScore.
In our pricing comparison of JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting's pricing starts at $3/month and is more affordable compared to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting's starting cost of $3/month.
Our comparison of JobScore vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting shows that SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. JobScore scores higher in quality of support, but SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
