In our comparison of JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud, iCIMS Talent Cloud is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
Ease of use, user-friendly, Candidate flow and templates can be customized, helpdesk rep is always alert and ready to respond to our queries positively. They are kind enough to let you know how to take the fullest advantage of the features you are aren't aware of.
Restricting user type is impossible, such as disabling managers to forward candidates not meeting the set criteria.
It is quite economical, it is helping us attain our targets thanks to the backing of the personable support team. It is also developing as a main competitor in this field.
Its design is intuitive in filtration and picking the most ideal applicants, the system contains nearly every metric needed for “talent administration” and reaching a wider group in “talent acquisition” is made possible by merging various portals. It has multi-platform abilities which to applicants are a major benefit, the iCIMS support team is exceptional-responsive, very keen/attentive to the client’s requirements, and incredibly helpful. Also, with the help of user clients, they are constantly making improvements to the software to develop more opportunities for business.
None.
According to a newly introduced feature, the resume has become a part of the job application but it doesn't let the candidate know it. It is something really appreciated by our company. It asked for the resumes of the current employees too. After negotiating this issue to the customer service rep, I was told, though I am a huge customer of their, to wait for a while which for no surprise to me continued for several months but ultimately it was done.
First we started with their free plan about which, I don't know still exists or not. It suited to our company's needs very well because we were not getting CVs through an email address. Further, we allocated different departs to concerned managers.
Bugs in upgrades, customer support is not responsive enough, their turnaround time is 48 hours which is pathetic. No distinction or respect for high paying customers.
Recruiting process is all in one place.
Reporting options are not too much.
Ease of use, user-friendly, Candidate flow and templates can be customized, helpdesk rep is always alert and ready to respond to our queries positively. They are kind enough to let you know how to take the fullest advantage of the features you are aren't aware of.
Restricting user type is impossible, such as disabling managers to forward candidates not meeting the set criteria.
According to a newly introduced feature, the resume has become a part of the job application but it doesn't let the candidate know it. It is something really appreciated by our company. It asked for the resumes of the current employees too. After negotiating this issue to the customer service rep, I was told, though I am a huge customer of their, to wait for a while which for no surprise to me continued for several months but ultimately it was done.
First we started with their free plan about which, I don't know still exists or not. It suited to our company's needs very well because we were not getting CVs through an email address. Further, we allocated different departs to concerned managers.
Bugs in upgrades, customer support is not responsive enough, their turnaround time is 48 hours which is pathetic. No distinction or respect for high paying customers.
It is quite economical, it is helping us attain our targets thanks to the backing of the personable support team. It is also developing as a main competitor in this field.
Its design is intuitive in filtration and picking the most ideal applicants, the system contains nearly every metric needed for “talent administration” and reaching a wider group in “talent acquisition” is made possible by merging various portals. It has multi-platform abilities which to applicants are a major benefit, the iCIMS support team is exceptional-responsive, very keen/attentive to the client’s requirements, and incredibly helpful. Also, with the help of user clients, they are constantly making improvements to the software to develop more opportunities for business.
None.
Recruiting process is all in one place.
Reporting options are not too much.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud, iCIMS Talent Cloud has 58 user reviews and JobScore has 19. The average star rating for iCIMS Talent Cloud is 4.5 while JobScore has an average rating of 4.26. iCIMS Talent Cloud has more positive reviews than JobScore. Comparing JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud reviews, iCIMS Talent Cloud has stronger overall reviews.
JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Human Resources (HR) Features, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Signature Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Project Management Features, Language & Speech, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud, iCIMS Talent Cloud offers more of the most popular features and tools than JobScore.
In our pricing comparison of JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud, iCIMS Talent Cloud's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to iCIMS Talent Cloud's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of JobScore vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud shows that iCIMS Talent Cloud scores higher in usability for . JobScore scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but iCIMS Talent Cloud has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
