In our comparison of Incydr vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The primary problem that the product solves is preventing and mitigating insider risk within organizations. By offering a user-friendly solution, it helps businesses protect their sensitive data and assets from internal threats, enhancing overall security measures.
The best aspect of this solution is its ability to address the critical issue of insider risk. It offers an easy-to-use and straightforward approach to tackling this risk, providing organizations with effective tools to prevent and mitigate potential threats.
However, a downside is the limited integrations with centralized platforms like ConnectWise and Kaseya. More extensive integrations would enhance the product's versatility and compatibility with existing systems.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
The product primarily addresses the issue of insider loss management, helping organizations mitigate risks associated with internal threats. It also provides data backup capabilities, contributing to overall data protection and security measures.
The standout aspect of the product is its excellent customer support, always ready to assist. Additionally, the software offers a wide variety of useful features that effectively track insider threats, enhancing security measures.
On the downside, the setup process can be a bit challenging and may require additional supervision to ensure proper configuration.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The primary problem that the product solves is preventing and mitigating insider risk within organizations. By offering a user-friendly solution, it helps businesses protect their sensitive data and assets from internal threats, enhancing overall security measures.
The best aspect of this solution is its ability to address the critical issue of insider risk. It offers an easy-to-use and straightforward approach to tackling this risk, providing organizations with effective tools to prevent and mitigate potential threats.
However, a downside is the limited integrations with centralized platforms like ConnectWise and Kaseya. More extensive integrations would enhance the product's versatility and compatibility with existing systems.
The product primarily addresses the issue of insider loss management, helping organizations mitigate risks associated with internal threats. It also provides data backup capabilities, contributing to overall data protection and security measures.
The standout aspect of the product is its excellent customer support, always ready to assist. Additionally, the software offers a wide variety of useful features that effectively track insider threats, enhancing security measures.
On the downside, the setup process can be a bit challenging and may require additional supervision to ensure proper configuration.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Incydr vs. ThreatConnect, Incydr has 4 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Incydr is 3.75 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Incydr has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Incydr vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Incydr has stronger overall reviews.
Incydr vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Incydr vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Incydr.
In our pricing comparison of Incydr vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Incydr vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Incydr scores higher in , but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
