In our comparison of Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For protecting apps in the cloud and across data centers, this platform is an absolute dream come true. Its strong security procedures not only stop network breaches, but its threat defense is excellent at apprehending malefactors right in their tracks. It integrates easily with current systems and functions in unison with firewalls and other security technologies.
Strong security, Threat defense, Flexible deployment, User-friendly
None
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Illumio's greatest feature is without a doubt its fine-grained control over domain controllers. I can carefully control service access using it, which greatly improves security. Even though I like the power, there are moments when I think it's unnecessary, especially when native domain controller tools provide some control already.
Granular control, customization, Enhanced security, Reduced risk
Complex, costly
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
For protecting apps in the cloud and across data centers, this platform is an absolute dream come true. Its strong security procedures not only stop network breaches, but its threat defense is excellent at apprehending malefactors right in their tracks. It integrates easily with current systems and functions in unison with firewalls and other security technologies.
Strong security, Threat defense, Flexible deployment, User-friendly
None
Illumio's greatest feature is without a doubt its fine-grained control over domain controllers. I can carefully control service access using it, which greatly improves security. Even though I like the power, there are moments when I think it's unnecessary, especially when native domain controller tools provide some control already.
Granular control, customization, Enhanced security, Reduced risk
Complex, costly
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect, Illumio Core has 6 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Illumio Core is 4.5 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Illumio Core has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Illumio Core has stronger overall reviews.
Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Illumio Core.
In our pricing comparison of Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Illumio Core vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve. Illumio Core scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
