In our comparison of IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The system's ability to accommodate custom fields, events, and logical units empowers users with potent low-code customization options. This flexibility ensures that the platform can be tailored to meet diverse and specific needs.
The low-code customization options enable powerful adaptations, ensuring that the system aligns seamlessly with unique business requirements.
Subpar support experience. Issues escalated to the support team often face extended resolution times, sometimes spanning weeks.
The experience of learning the modules of this software was great. The purchasing, manufacturing, and quality control modules are some of the modules I have used on a regular basis for my teams operations. Professionals in large institutions are highly encouraged to license this software.
The most interesting feature of this software is the multi-dimensional utility for various departments. From shipping, receiving, planning, insurance, manufacturing, etc. this tool is very useful, it offers a transparent system for a processes’ overview via disparate modules, when it comes to inventory management, quality metrics, batch scheduling, etc. it is very productive, and in order to streamline operations this solution is essential for all large institutions.
Limited availability of software experts to teach on the software and novices find it complicated to learn the software.
The system's ability to accommodate custom fields, events, and logical units empowers users with potent low-code customization options. This flexibility ensures that the platform can be tailored to meet diverse and specific needs.
The low-code customization options enable powerful adaptations, ensuring that the system aligns seamlessly with unique business requirements.
Subpar support experience. Issues escalated to the support team often face extended resolution times, sometimes spanning weeks.
All in all, we’re contented with the final tool and we’ve had a great and pleasant experience. However, in order to offer a more comprehensive tool to their customers and attract more prospective customers to join their portfolio, much more needs to be done to this software.
Using it is easy, it is extremely functional, has well designed integrations, very useful in maintaining your business’s accounting control, and regarding linking your customers and providers with their individual invoices, it is extremely useful.
Extremely terrible client care support-very slow when updating the system.
The system's ability to accommodate custom fields, events, and logical units empowers users with potent low-code customization options. This flexibility ensures that the platform can be tailored to meet diverse and specific needs.
The low-code customization options enable powerful adaptations, ensuring that the system aligns seamlessly with unique business requirements.
Subpar support experience. Issues escalated to the support team often face extended resolution times, sometimes spanning weeks.
The system's ability to accommodate custom fields, events, and logical units empowers users with potent low-code customization options. This flexibility ensures that the platform can be tailored to meet diverse and specific needs.
The low-code customization options enable powerful adaptations, ensuring that the system aligns seamlessly with unique business requirements.
Subpar support experience. Issues escalated to the support team often face extended resolution times, sometimes spanning weeks.
The experience of learning the modules of this software was great. The purchasing, manufacturing, and quality control modules are some of the modules I have used on a regular basis for my teams operations. Professionals in large institutions are highly encouraged to license this software.
The most interesting feature of this software is the multi-dimensional utility for various departments. From shipping, receiving, planning, insurance, manufacturing, etc. this tool is very useful, it offers a transparent system for a processes’ overview via disparate modules, when it comes to inventory management, quality metrics, batch scheduling, etc. it is very productive, and in order to streamline operations this solution is essential for all large institutions.
Limited availability of software experts to teach on the software and novices find it complicated to learn the software.
All in all, we’re contented with the final tool and we’ve had a great and pleasant experience. However, in order to offer a more comprehensive tool to their customers and attract more prospective customers to join their portfolio, much more needs to be done to this software.
Using it is easy, it is extremely functional, has well designed integrations, very useful in maintaining your business’s accounting control, and regarding linking your customers and providers with their individual invoices, it is extremely useful.
Extremely terrible client care support-very slow when updating the system.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has 75 user reviews and IFS has 9. The average star rating for SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management is 4.24 while IFS has an average rating of 3.88. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has more positive reviews than IFS. Comparing IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management reviews, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has stronger overall reviews.
IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Employee Management, Accounting Features, Project Management Features, Customer Management, Lead Management, Asset Management, Workforce Optimization, Campaign Management, Shipping & Logistics Management, Payroll Management, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Expense Management, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Portal Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Third-Party Integrations, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management, IFS offers more of the most popular features and tools than SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management.
In our pricing comparison of IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management's pricing starts at $39/month and is more affordable compared to SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management's starting cost of $39/month.
Our comparison of IFS vs. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management shows that IFS scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve. SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but IFS has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
