In our comparison of HackerOne vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For me, HackerOne has proven indispensable for reporting and verifying security-related issues on my website. It's also a valuable tool for assessing security vulnerabilities in my software.
User-friendly interface, reliable, and high efficiency.
On occasion, reported bugs may not be promptly verified. Also, it's worth noting that the pricing can be on the higher side, which might pose a consideration for some users.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
Although its reputation and visibility within the security researcher community are undeniable, smaller businesses and B2B products may find the premium features a bit pricey. It's a game-changer, though, for larger firms that run bug bounty programs. It's easy to manage vulnerabilities and reward ethical hackers thanks to the user-friendly and intuitive user interface.
Simple UI, Dedicated system,
Limited scope, expensive
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
For me, HackerOne has proven indispensable for reporting and verifying security-related issues on my website. It's also a valuable tool for assessing security vulnerabilities in my software.
User-friendly interface, reliable, and high efficiency.
On occasion, reported bugs may not be promptly verified. Also, it's worth noting that the pricing can be on the higher side, which might pose a consideration for some users.
Although its reputation and visibility within the security researcher community are undeniable, smaller businesses and B2B products may find the premium features a bit pricey. It's a game-changer, though, for larger firms that run bug bounty programs. It's easy to manage vulnerabilities and reward ethical hackers thanks to the user-friendly and intuitive user interface.
Simple UI, Dedicated system,
Limited scope, expensive
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of HackerOne vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint has 15 user reviews and HackerOne has 8. The average star rating for Proofpoint is 4.66 while HackerOne has an average rating of 4.37. Proofpoint has more positive reviews than HackerOne. Comparing HackerOne vs. Proofpoint reviews, Proofpoint has stronger overall reviews.
HackerOne vs. Proofpoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Cloud Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of HackerOne vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than HackerOne.
In our pricing comparison of HackerOne vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Proofpoint's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of HackerOne vs. Proofpoint shows that HackerOne scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve. Proofpoint scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but HackerOne has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
