In our comparison of FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
FortiClient's assurances of impenetrable security and intuitive administration were fulfilled. I particularly enjoyed how simple cloud control was, how EDR worked, and how the EPP suite made it a complete security solution. Their support staff is excellent and always willing to assist. Deployment and integration went smoothly as well. Additionally, it increased our business agility by allowing safe, remote work from any location. Even while there were a few little setbacks, such as sporadic login issues and resource-intensive performance that occasionally caused latency, the overall advantages definitely outweighed them.
Great support, easy to use,
Login errors, lagging issues
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
The main advantages of FortiClient are its incredibly strong security and ease of use. I can work remotely with confidence knowing that my home PC's personal and professional data is securely protected. The sole drawback? Official support is lacking for our company's budget edition, but the trade-off for a trouble-free, seamless experience is worthwhile. FortiClient checks all the boxes for easy-to-use, trustworthy security for home offices.
Security, quick and easy to use
No support given for free version
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
FortiClient's assurances of impenetrable security and intuitive administration were fulfilled. I particularly enjoyed how simple cloud control was, how EDR worked, and how the EPP suite made it a complete security solution. Their support staff is excellent and always willing to assist. Deployment and integration went smoothly as well. Additionally, it increased our business agility by allowing safe, remote work from any location. Even while there were a few little setbacks, such as sporadic login issues and resource-intensive performance that occasionally caused latency, the overall advantages definitely outweighed them.
Great support, easy to use,
Login errors, lagging issues
The main advantages of FortiClient are its incredibly strong security and ease of use. I can work remotely with confidence knowing that my home PC's personal and professional data is securely protected. The sole drawback? Official support is lacking for our company's budget edition, but the trade-off for a trouble-free, seamless experience is worthwhile. FortiClient checks all the boxes for easy-to-use, trustworthy security for home offices.
Security, quick and easy to use
No support given for free version
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect, FortiClient has 18 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for FortiClient is 4.11 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. FortiClient has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect reviews, FortiClient has stronger overall reviews.
FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than FortiClient.
In our pricing comparison of FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of FortiClient vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve. FortiClient scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
