In our comparison of Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM, Forescout is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The amazing NAC solution Forescout Platform offers total control and visibility over all IP-based endpoints. It can be used to prohibit unauthorized systems and establish regulations based on corporate compliance. Additionally, it can provide comprehensive details about every endpoint, such as the switch and port to which it is attached. However, as the Forescout Platform needs to be integrated with numerous other systems, its implementation can be challenging and time-consuming. Furthermore, the new software version is frequently glitchy, and TAC help is not always quick or efficient.
Effective end-point management, IP visibility and assessment, custom policy setup, patch management, inventory/asset management
Implementation is time-consuming, mediocre TAC support, multiple bugs in latest version, troubleshooting is time-consuming, more expensive than the competition
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
The finest network access control (NAC) solution I've found is Forescout Platform. It's simple to use and has easy access to everything. Compared to competing NAC solutions, the online support and developer community are smaller, but the product quality is so high that it makes up for it.
Easy to use, secure
Limited online support
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
The amazing NAC solution Forescout Platform offers total control and visibility over all IP-based endpoints. It can be used to prohibit unauthorized systems and establish regulations based on corporate compliance. Additionally, it can provide comprehensive details about every endpoint, such as the switch and port to which it is attached. However, as the Forescout Platform needs to be integrated with numerous other systems, its implementation can be challenging and time-consuming. Furthermore, the new software version is frequently glitchy, and TAC help is not always quick or efficient.
Effective end-point management, IP visibility and assessment, custom policy setup, patch management, inventory/asset management
Implementation is time-consuming, mediocre TAC support, multiple bugs in latest version, troubleshooting is time-consuming, more expensive than the competition
The finest network access control (NAC) solution I've found is Forescout Platform. It's simple to use and has easy access to everything. Compared to competing NAC solutions, the online support and developer community are smaller, but the product quality is so high that it makes up for it.
Easy to use, secure
Limited online support
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM, Forescout has 9 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Forescout is 4.55 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Forescout has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, Forescout has stronger overall reviews.
Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Network Management, Systems/Administrative, Device Management, Application Management. In our feature comparison of Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM, Forescout offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Forescout vs. QRadar SIEM shows that Forescout scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but Forescout has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
