In our comparison of Falcon vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
N/A
This system is solving a variety of problems for me, such as covering endpoint/cloud/threat/identity/security and observation with the help of AI and human expertise. This takes away a lot of the perceived oversight of security required by the business and allows us to concentrate on what we do best.
What I like best about Crowdstrike is how easy it is to deploy with the amazing help of their staff. Additionally, it has a very small footprint on resources, and the Falcon Dashboard is incredibly intuitive. The reports generated are of a standard that can be shared with the Exec team and is fully understood.
I cannot think of anything that I dislike about this product.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
CrowdStrike is a trustworthy endpoint security solution that offers transparent security and first-rate support, giving users peace of mind. Even without a local interface, CrowdStrike is a great tool for safeguarding your most important information.
Good protection
Interfce that is not local
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
This system is solving a variety of problems for me, such as covering endpoint/cloud/threat/identity/security and observation with the help of AI and human expertise. This takes away a lot of the perceived oversight of security required by the business and allows us to concentrate on what we do best.
What I like best about Crowdstrike is how easy it is to deploy with the amazing help of their staff. Additionally, it has a very small footprint on resources, and the Falcon Dashboard is incredibly intuitive. The reports generated are of a standard that can be shared with the Exec team and is fully understood.
I cannot think of anything that I dislike about this product.
CrowdStrike is a trustworthy endpoint security solution that offers transparent security and first-rate support, giving users peace of mind. Even without a local interface, CrowdStrike is a great tool for safeguarding your most important information.
Good protection
Interfce that is not local
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Falcon vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Falcon has 7. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Falcon has an average rating of 4.71. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Falcon. Comparing Falcon vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Falcon vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Network Management, Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Falcon vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Falcon.
In our pricing comparison of Falcon vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Falcon vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Falcon scores higher in usability for ease of use, ease of admin. Perimeter 81 scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but Falcon has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
