In our comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown, Endpoint Protector has 10 user reviews and ThreatDown has 122. The average star rating for Endpoint Protector is 4.7 while ThreatDown has an average rating of 4.69. Endpoint Protector has more positive reviews than ThreatDown. Comparing Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown reviews, Endpoint Protector has stronger overall reviews.
Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown offers more of the most popular features and tools than Endpoint Protector.
In our pricing comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatDown's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. ThreatDown shows that ThreatDown scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin. Endpoint Protector scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but ThreatDown has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
