In our comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. Thales, Thales is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
The Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform solves a range of problems and offers significant benefits to users. It ensures compliance with regulations and standards, enabling organizations to meet their compliance obligations effectively. Additionally, the platform facilitates data discovery and classification, assisting in identifying and categorizing sensitive information accurately. Furthermore, it enables monitoring, detection, control, and reporting of data access, enhancing overall data security practices. Finally, the platform's tokenization feature plays a crucial role in data protection, adding an extra layer of security to sensitive information.
There are areas that could benefit from improvement. Specifically, centralized data management could be enhanced to streamline processes and enhance overall efficiency. Furthermore, the reporting functionality could be improved to provide more comprehensive and detailed insights into data security.
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
CipherTrust Data Security Platform effectively solves the problems related to data security operations such as protection, discovery, and control. This greatly benefits me by providing the necessary tools and measures to safeguard my data.
What I like best about Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform is how it simplifies data security, reducing compliance time and ensuring the protection of data during cloud migration. Thales delivers more than I could expect.
I find that the platform's numerous features and control options make it slightly cumbersome to operate. However, I understand that this is a result of the demanding industry, so I can't really complain.
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
The Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform solves a range of problems and offers significant benefits to users. It ensures compliance with regulations and standards, enabling organizations to meet their compliance obligations effectively. Additionally, the platform facilitates data discovery and classification, assisting in identifying and categorizing sensitive information accurately. Furthermore, it enables monitoring, detection, control, and reporting of data access, enhancing overall data security practices. Finally, the platform's tokenization feature plays a crucial role in data protection, adding an extra layer of security to sensitive information.
There are areas that could benefit from improvement. Specifically, centralized data management could be enhanced to streamline processes and enhance overall efficiency. Furthermore, the reporting functionality could be improved to provide more comprehensive and detailed insights into data security.
CipherTrust Data Security Platform effectively solves the problems related to data security operations such as protection, discovery, and control. This greatly benefits me by providing the necessary tools and measures to safeguard my data.
What I like best about Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform is how it simplifies data security, reducing compliance time and ensuring the protection of data during cloud migration. Thales delivers more than I could expect.
I find that the platform's numerous features and control options make it slightly cumbersome to operate. However, I understand that this is a result of the demanding industry, so I can't really complain.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. Thales, Endpoint Protector has 10 user reviews and Thales has 3. The average star rating for Endpoint Protector is 4.7 while Thales has an average rating of 4.33. Endpoint Protector has more positive reviews than Thales. Comparing Endpoint Protector vs. Thales reviews, Endpoint Protector has stronger overall reviews.
Endpoint Protector vs. Thales both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Data Management, Systems/Administrative, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, File Management. In our feature comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. Thales, Thales offers more of the most popular features and tools than Endpoint Protector.
In our pricing comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. Thales, Thales's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Thales's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. Thales shows that Thales scores higher in usability for meets requirements, ease of admin. Endpoint Protector scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but Thales has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
