In our comparison of .LRN vs. Connect, Connect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The LRN Catalyst Platform is a user-friendly platform for managing ethics and compliance that is attractive to the eye. It is an effective tool for yearly compliance training since it is simple to use and has a strong recordkeeping database. But by incorporating an artificially intelligent voiceover program, expanding the selection of images, and introducing more narration, the platform might be made better.
Pleasant to use and easy to navigate and create slides
More reading is needed, limited narration and image selection should be improved
My journey with Connect has been a rollercoaster of experiences. While it serves its fundamental purpose of submitting homework and ensuring it reaches my professor, the road to that point has been rocky.
Facilitates homework submission.
Frequent connectivity issues. Unreliable synchronization with Blackboard.
Vault is a reliable, well-coded platform that rarely causes problems during mergers. It features an excellent diffmerge tool and interfaces with Visual Studio effectively. Because it is stand-alone and offline compatible, this may not work well if a different team member has to upload a file that is checked out. With Vault, branching and forking are not very reliable.
Excellect customer support, option for SSO, third-party integration, training resources available
None
The performance of students has enhanced due to ability to access content and resources even outside the classroom. McGraw-Hill has an abundance of available resources for students and teachers for each topic provided.
Ability of teachers to tailor assignments and tests, students have study materials and interactive modules to assist in understanding content more fluently, and ability of teachers to see reports so that they can change their style and approach of teaching.
The interface look is quite dated, linking it as a third-party app is hard, no direct or easy way of students to converse with their professors in McGraw-Hill, and lack of a better and limited accessible types like mobile gadgets to inspire use-on-the-go
The LRN Catalyst Platform is a user-friendly platform for managing ethics and compliance that is attractive to the eye. It is an effective tool for yearly compliance training since it is simple to use and has a strong recordkeeping database. But by incorporating an artificially intelligent voiceover program, expanding the selection of images, and introducing more narration, the platform might be made better.
Pleasant to use and easy to navigate and create slides
More reading is needed, limited narration and image selection should be improved
Vault is a reliable, well-coded platform that rarely causes problems during mergers. It features an excellent diffmerge tool and interfaces with Visual Studio effectively. Because it is stand-alone and offline compatible, this may not work well if a different team member has to upload a file that is checked out. With Vault, branching and forking are not very reliable.
Excellect customer support, option for SSO, third-party integration, training resources available
None
My journey with Connect has been a rollercoaster of experiences. While it serves its fundamental purpose of submitting homework and ensuring it reaches my professor, the road to that point has been rocky.
Facilitates homework submission.
Frequent connectivity issues. Unreliable synchronization with Blackboard.
The performance of students has enhanced due to ability to access content and resources even outside the classroom. McGraw-Hill has an abundance of available resources for students and teachers for each topic provided.
Ability of teachers to tailor assignments and tests, students have study materials and interactive modules to assist in understanding content more fluently, and ability of teachers to see reports so that they can change their style and approach of teaching.
The interface look is quite dated, linking it as a third-party app is hard, no direct or easy way of students to converse with their professors in McGraw-Hill, and lack of a better and limited accessible types like mobile gadgets to inspire use-on-the-go
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of .LRN vs. Connect, Connect has 23 user reviews and .LRN has 2. The average star rating for Connect is 3.73 while .LRN has an average rating of 3.5. Connect has more positive reviews than .LRN. Comparing .LRN vs. Connect reviews, Connect has stronger overall reviews.
.LRN vs. Connect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Learning Management, Course Management, Content Management, Collaboration Tools, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Content Types, Portal Types, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations. In our feature comparison of .LRN vs. Connect, Connect offers more of the most popular features and tools than .LRN.
In our pricing comparison of .LRN vs. Connect, Connect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Connect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of .LRN vs. Connect shows that Connect scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. .LRN scores higher in meets requirements, but Connect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
