In our comparison of DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
It sets a high bar with its strong global policies, simple configuration, quick speed, and flawless interoperability with Active Directory. As early adopters, we have seen its revolutionary effect on improving our clients' online security and increasing our company's profit margins. When compared to the more expensive OpenDNS Umbrella, DNSFilter is superior because of its regular enhancements and quick implementation of partner feedback by a receptive crew.
Global policies, ease of configuration, speed, integrations with AD
None
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
For our company, DNSFilter has been a revelation. It was implemented in a matter of minutes, from sign-up to deployment. We now have an additional security layer and useful information about the browsing behavior of our employees. This greatly improves our remote device management when combined with our current firewall and antivirus software, ensuring that our fleet is safe even as remote work becomes more common.
Easy to set up, provides additional security protection, gives insights into employee web browsing activity
Reporting is not good enough
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
It sets a high bar with its strong global policies, simple configuration, quick speed, and flawless interoperability with Active Directory. As early adopters, we have seen its revolutionary effect on improving our clients' online security and increasing our company's profit margins. When compared to the more expensive OpenDNS Umbrella, DNSFilter is superior because of its regular enhancements and quick implementation of partner feedback by a receptive crew.
Global policies, ease of configuration, speed, integrations with AD
None
For our company, DNSFilter has been a revelation. It was implemented in a matter of minutes, from sign-up to deployment. We now have an additional security layer and useful information about the browsing behavior of our employees. This greatly improves our remote device management when combined with our current firewall and antivirus software, ensuring that our fleet is safe even as remote work becomes more common.
Easy to set up, provides additional security protection, gives insights into employee web browsing activity
Reporting is not good enough
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect, DNSFilter has 13 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for DNSFilter is 4.84 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. DNSFilter has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect reviews, DNSFilter has stronger overall reviews.
DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than DNSFilter.
In our pricing comparison of DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of DNSFilter vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. DNSFilter scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
